Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NX related build failure in latest pv_ops dom0 hackery tree

[Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>]

Yes , same two stack traces on C2D E8400 AHCI box.
I believe it happened to me about 2 months ago.
That time patches were suggested by you pretty fast.
Kernel 2.6.30-rc1-tip behaves stable on both AHCI boxes (8 GB RAM)
I've just built CentOS 5.3 PV DomU on Q9550 box with no trouble
get dmesg reports and send first message to you. I also reinstalled
Xen Unstable 3.4-rc2-pre from scratch, trying to get stubdom working.
All mentioned stuff has been performed via remote VNC session , which took about 2.5 -3  hr with no interruptions.
Boris



--- On Tue, 4/14/09, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NX related build failure in latest pv_ops dom0 hackery tree
To: "Christophe Saout" <christophe@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tuesday, April 14, 2009, 12:53 PM

Christophe Saout wrote:
> In the meantime, you can try to use that tree:
>
> http://git.saout.de/gitweb/?p=linux-dom0-pvops.git;a=summary
>
> It's the latest tip.git merged with one of the push branches from
> Jeremy's git repo and cherry-picked commits from the backend, blkback
> and netback trees plus minor merge conflict and compile problem fixups.
> It seems feature-complete to me, stable and is able to run DomU domains
> without problems.
>   

Does it work with AHCI drives for you?  It isn't for me (nor my remerge, 
so I'm not sure what has broken in the meantime...).

    J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing
 list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

dmesg.system.c2d8400
Description: Binary data

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel