|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: about fixup_page_fault
On 17/12/2008 10:58, "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 17/12/2008 10:53, "Tim Deegan" <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> At 09:04 +0000 on 17 Dec (1229504644), Keir Fraser wrote:
>>> A Xen fault shouldn't cause a lookup in guest tables for HVM guests.
>>
>> Looks like it does, though. :( The check in fixup_page_fault should
>> probably be more like:
>
> But wouldn't this just cause an infinite loop? Since shadow code would fix up
> the fault in the guest shadow tables, which the hypervisor is not running on?
For clarity: I don't mean your patch would cause this. I mean the existing
code would have this behaviour, if this were the problem.
If you still think a patch is needed here then please send it along.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] about fixup_page_fault, Tian, Kevin
- [Xen-devel] Re: about fixup_page_fault, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] RE: about fixup_page_fault, Tian, Kevin
- [Xen-devel] Re: about fixup_page_fault, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] RE: about fixup_page_fault, Tian, Kevin
- [Xen-devel] Re: about fixup_page_fault, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] RE: about fixup_page_fault, Tian, Kevin
- [Xen-devel] RE: about fixup_page_fault, Tian, Kevin
- [Xen-devel] Re: about fixup_page_fault, Tim Deegan
- [Xen-devel] Re: about fixup_page_fault, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] Re: about fixup_page_fault,
Keir Fraser <=
- [Xen-devel] Re: about fixup_page_fault, Tim Deegan
- [Xen-devel] Re: about fixup_page_fault, Tim Deegan
- [Xen-devel] Re: about fixup_page_fault, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Re: about fixup_page_fault, Tim Deegan
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Re: about fixup_page_fault, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] RE: about fixup_page_fault, Tian, Kevin
- [Xen-devel] RE: about fixup_page_fault, Tian, Kevin
|
|
|
|
|