xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops dom0 testing with ICH6
Through my experience , when "atapiix" gets loaded at boot up linux intends access hard drives via IDE interface.
--- On Wed, 12/3/08, Andrew Lyon <andrew.lyon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Andrew Lyon <andrew.lyon@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops dom0 testing with ICH6 To: bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx Cc: deshantm@xxxxxxxxx, "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Wednesday, December 3, 2008, 5:07 PM
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 8:36 PM, Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Todd, Andy, > > I suspect , that South Bridge is Intel ICH6 due to :- > > [0.538964] pci 0000:00:1f.0: quirk: region 0800-087f claimed by >
ICH6 ACPI/GPIO/TCO > [0.538973] pci 0000:00:1f.0: quirk: region 0880-08bf claimed by ICH6 GPIO > > I had CentOS 5.1 running with AHCI driver on Asus P5K-E board > with ICH9R and BIOS,actually,been unable to turn on AHCI. > WinXP SP2 detected SATA Drive without IAStor.sys on that box(!) > > Keeping in mind to reduce cost to minimum, i would suggest > any Intel(ASUS,MSI) board with well tested South Bridge > ICH(8,9)R for fairly trustable results. > > Personally, i don't trust ICH6 whatever happens on this chipset > in regards of the most recent linux kernels (like 2.6.28).
Hmm, i will try adding a sata card instead..
> I would double check openSUSE 11 (11.1) log for ata driver > been loaded during booting up ( suspect "atapiix" been > selected)
I'm not actually using openSUSE, I just took the xen patches from opensuse kernel and (with some
slight modifications) applied them to vanilla 2.6.27, my kernel is only patched with patches.xen.bz2, none of the other opensuse patches are used.
So atapiix should not be selected? I tried switching it off already but it didnt help.
Will do more testing tomorrow.
Andy
> > Boris. > > > > > --- On Wed, 12/3/08, Todd Deshane <deshantm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Todd Deshane <deshantm@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops dom0 testing > To: bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx > Cc: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, > "Andrew Lyon" <andrew.lyon@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Wednesday, December 3, 2008, 1:55 PM > > Boris, > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> Andy, >> >> I am a
bit confused , trying to follow up the thread running by Todd and >> you. >> Are this messages coming up on your box ? >> >> pci 0000:00:1f.0: quirk: region 0800-087f claimed by ICH6 ACPI/GPIO/TCO >> pci 0000:00:1f.0: quirk: region 0880-08bf claimed by ICH6 > GPIO >> > > These lines are coming up for me (previously attached on xen-devel as > xenboot.out3) > > [ 0.538964] pci 0000:00:1f.0: quirk: region 0800-087f claimed by > ICH6 ACPI/GPIO/TCO > [ 0.538973] pci 0000:00:1f.0: quirk: region 0880-08bf claimed by ICH6 > GPIO > > What do you make of them? > > Cheers, > Todd > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > >
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] pv_ops dom0 testing, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] pv_ops dom0 testing, Todd Deshane
- Re: [Xen-devel] pv_ops dom0 testing, Andrew Lyon
- Re: [Xen-devel] pv_ops dom0 testing, Todd Deshane
- Re: [Xen-devel] pv_ops dom0 testing, Andrew Lyon
- Re: [Xen-devel] pv_ops dom0 testing, Boris Derzhavets
- [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops dom0 testing, Andrew Lyon
- [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops dom0 testing, Boris Derzhavets
- [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops dom0 testing, Todd Deshane
- [Xen-devel] pv_ops dom0 testing with ICH6, Boris Derzhavets
- [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops dom0 testing with ICH6, Andrew Lyon
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops dom0 testing with ICH6,
Boris Derzhavets <=
- [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops dom0 testing, Andrew Lyon
- [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops dom0 testing, Andrew Lyon
- [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops dom0 testing, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Re: [Xen-devel] pv_ops dom0 testing, Boris Derzhavets
|
|
|