On 03/12/2008 10:13, "Isaku Yamahata" <yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> If you are fully virtualised then gmfn should mean gpfn, and
>> arbitrary_virt_to_machine() is correct, isn't it? I can't see a situation
>> where arbitrary_virt_to_machine() wouldn't correctly give you a gmfn (after
>> all, it gets you a machine address in guest context, as its name describes
>> :-).
>
> Oh, you are quite right.
> Do you agree to rename PHYSDEVOP_pirq_eoi_mfn to PHYSDEVOP_pirq_eoi_gmfn?
Yes, and I'll fix up your patches myself to use a_v_t_m() always.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|