WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [PATCH] fix ia64 breakage with PHYSDEVOP_pirq_eoi_mfn (was Re: [Xen-

To: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix ia64 breakage with PHYSDEVOP_pirq_eoi_mfn (was Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] linux/x86: use shared page indicating the need for an EOI notification)
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 10:15:33 +0000
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 02:16:05 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20081203101353.GJ15798%yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AclVMBN1MFZ4iXd39EWrwxfzXeczug==
Thread-topic: [PATCH] fix ia64 breakage with PHYSDEVOP_pirq_eoi_mfn (was Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] linux/x86: use shared page indicating the need for an EOI notification)
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.14.0.081024
On 03/12/2008 10:13, "Isaku Yamahata" <yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> If you are fully virtualised then gmfn should mean gpfn, and
>> arbitrary_virt_to_machine() is correct, isn't it? I can't see a situation
>> where arbitrary_virt_to_machine() wouldn't correctly give you a gmfn (after
>> all, it gets you a machine address in guest context, as its name describes
>> :-). 
> 
> Oh, you are quite right.
> Do you agree to rename PHYSDEVOP_pirq_eoi_mfn to PHYSDEVOP_pirq_eoi_gmfn?

Yes, and I'll fix up your patches myself to use a_v_t_m() always.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>