Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/4] xen interface for HVM S3

[Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Patches 2 and 3 look okay. Patch 4 is not really useful as it is, as you
pointed out. And that then raises the question of what *is* the usage
scenario for this feature? This also raises questions about patch 1 -- as it
is I think it will need some cleaning up, but if we only wanted to do S3
across guest save/restore then we may not need Xen changes at all. We simply
would not save/restore HVM sate but instead have tools manufacture a correct
initial HVM state to load during restore. Corresponding to a clean
initialised system with BP about to enter the BIOS.

 -- Keir

On 8/5/08 09:30, "Ke, Liping" <liping.ke@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi, all
> Some comments about test:
> Tested the four patch under following HVM image, based on cs17589
> 1. Fc6 32/32e guest with both txt/X windows mode, no-vtd.
> 2. Fc6 32/32e guest with both txt/X windows mode, vtd-enabled,
>    assign one network card to the guest.
> 3. Fc5 32e HVM guest with PV driver, both txt/x windows mode.
> It works fine. Test including little stress test,
> such as S3 several times.
> Thanks& Regards,
> Criping



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel