|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings
 
| 
To:  | 
dean gaudet <dean@xxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Subject:  | 
[Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings | 
 
| 
From:  | 
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Date:  | 
Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:34:57 -0700 | 
 
| 
Cc:  | 
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Morten , David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>,	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Bøgeskov <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx,	Mark Williamson <mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Delivery-date:  | 
Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:35:34 -0700 | 
 
| 
Envelope-to:  | 
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
In-reply-to:  | 
<alpine.DEB.0.9999.0710212015430.2320@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
List-help:  | 
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> | 
 
| 
List-id:  | 
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-post:  | 
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-subscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> | 
 
| 
List-unsubscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> | 
 
| 
References:  | 
<470FA7C3.90404@xxxxxxxx> <20071014225618.GN23367404@xxxxxxx>	<4712A254.4090604@xxxxxxxx>	<200710151415.07248.nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>	<alpine.DEB.0.9999.0710212015430.2320@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Sender:  | 
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
User-agent:  | 
Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070727) | 
 
 
 
dean gaudet wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
>   
>> Yes, as Dave said, vmap (more specifically: vunmap) is very expensive
>> because it generally has to invalidate TLBs on all CPUs.
>>     
>
> why is that?  ignoring 32-bit archs we have heaps of address space 
> available... couldn't the kernel just burn address space and delay global 
> TLB invalidate by some relatively long time (say 1 second)?
>   
Yes, that's precisely the problem.  xfs does delay the unmap, leaving
stray mappings, which upsets Xen.
    J
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- [Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, (continued)
 
- [Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, dean gaudet
 - [Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <=
 - [Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, dean gaudet
 - [Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, Nick Piggin
 - [Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 
- [Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 
- [Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, Andi Kleen
 - [Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 - [Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, Andi Kleen
 - [Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 
- [Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, David Chinner
 - [Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, Andi Kleen
 
 
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |