|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [xfs-masters] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS:	stray
 
| 
To:  | 
xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
Subject:  | 
[Xen-devel] Re: [xfs-masters] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS:	stray RW mappings | 
 
| 
From:  | 
Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Date:  | 
Mon, 15 Oct 2007 10:31:41 +0200 | 
 
| 
Cc:  | 
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>,	Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>,	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Morten B?geskov <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx,	Mark Williamson <mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Delivery-date:  | 
Mon, 15 Oct 2007 04:01:33 -0700 | 
 
| 
Envelope-to:  | 
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
In-reply-to:  | 
<20071015042546.GI995458@xxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
List-help:  | 
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> | 
 
| 
List-id:  | 
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-post:  | 
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-subscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> | 
 
| 
List-unsubscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> | 
 
| 
References:  | 
<470FA7C3.90404@xxxxxxxx>	<200710151415.07248.nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>	<4712BB05.1020701@xxxxxxxx>	<200710151726.08387.nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>	<4712E1AA.501@xxxxxxxx> <20071015041133.GH995458@xxxxxxx>	<4712EA09.6000102@xxxxxxxx> <20071015042546.GI995458@xxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Sender:  | 
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
User-agent:  | 
Mutt/1.3.28i | 
 
 
 
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 02:25:46PM +1000, David Chinner wrote:
> > Hm, well I saw the problem with a filesystem made with mkfs.xfs with no
> > options, so there must be at least *some* vmapping going on there.
> 
> Sorry - I should have been more precise - vmap should never be used in
> performance critical paths on default configs.  Log recovery will
> trigger vmap/vunmap usage, so this is probably what you are seeing.
The iclogs are also vmapped, but they aren't unmapped until unmount so
this optimizations doesn't matter either.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- [Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, (continued)
 
- [Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, dean gaudet
 - [Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 - [Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, dean gaudet
 - [Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, Nick Piggin
 - [Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 
- [Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 
- [Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, Andi Kleen
 - [Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 - [Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, Andi Kleen
 - [Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 
 
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |