|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
>>> Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 08.05.07 23:34 >>>
>On 8/5/07 21:47, "Kaushik Barde" <Kaushik_Barde@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> <<However, doing one or two calls back to real mode before
>> dom0 even starts to execute should definitely not be a problem
>>>>
>>
>> Ok.. We will test this solution.
>>
>> I am curious,
>>
>> Why else would you be jumping into real mode after/before the Dom0
>> creation?
>
>For one thing, there's some extended BIOS data that Linux would like to get
>its hands on. Another is that it might be nice to get the memory-map
>information for ourselves instead of relying on the bootloader (there's at
>least one system we've seen where GRUB gets it wrong). Really there aren't
>that many examples, and they'd all be invoked at start-of-day.
... and for which I had already posted patches to do all that's needed before
entering C code (and namely, before enabling paging and [on x86-64] long
mode), almost like Linux does - I have to admit that I continue to favor that
solution, including extending it to set the VESA mode and, if that's really
important as you say, calling INT 15 fn E820.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] vesafb, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] vesafb, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] vesafb, Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] vesafb, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] vesafb, Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] vesafb, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] vesafb, Kaushik Barde
- Re: [Xen-devel] vesafb, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] vesafb, Kaushik Barde
- Re: [Xen-devel] vesafb, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] vesafb, Kaushik Barde
- Re: [Xen-devel] vesafb,
Jan Beulich <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] vesafb, Keir Fraser
RE: [Xen-devel] vesafb, Ian Pratt
|
|
|
|
|