|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
On 8/5/07 20:20, "Kaushik Barde" <Kaushik_Barde@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I Agree with Kier.
>
> And from our experience (Phoenix) BIOS reserved areas usually aren't
> clobbered (except for a vendor specific BIOS/system customizations)
>
> I am also not sure about why can't we create Dom0 interface changes?
>
> Like I presented in my email earlier, is following ok?
Jan's specific concerns are relating to interrupts, NMIs and machine-check
exceptions, if we return to real-mode at arbitrary times after the machine
has finished booting. Those concerns are quite reasonable (but, I think,
work-aroundable). However, doing one or two calls back to real mode before
dom0 even starts to execute should definitely not be a problem - that's not
what is being argued against here.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] vesafb, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] vesafb, ron minnich
- RE: [Xen-devel] vesafb, Ian Pratt
- RE: [Xen-devel] vesafb, Kaushik Barde
- RE: [Xen-devel] vesafb, Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] vesafb, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] vesafb, Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] vesafb, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] vesafb, Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] vesafb, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] vesafb, Kaushik Barde
- Re: [Xen-devel] vesafb,
Keir Fraser <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] vesafb, Kaushik Barde
- Re: [Xen-devel] vesafb, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] vesafb, Kaushik Barde
- Re: [Xen-devel] vesafb, Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] vesafb, Keir Fraser
RE: [Xen-devel] vesafb, Ian Pratt
|
|
|
|
|