Re: [Xen-devel][PATCH][RESEND] PV drivers for HVM guests

To:	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel][PATCH][RESEND] PV drivers for HVM guests
From:	Doi.Tsunehisa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date:	Thu, 26 Oct 2006 12:58:04 +0900
Cc:	Ky Srinivasan <ksrinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Doi.Tsunehisa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Wed, 25 Oct 2006 20:58:48 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	Your message of Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:13:56 +0900. <200610260013.k9Q0DuF16474@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<4535F8F5.E57C.0030.0@xxxxxxxxxx> Your message of Wed, 18 Oct 2006 07:51:45 -0600. <4535F8F5.E57C.0030.0@xxxxxxxxxx> <200610182356.k9INuAF03840@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45374AE9.E57C.0030.0@xxxxxxxxxx> Your message of Thu, 19 Oct 2006 07:53:42 -0600. <45374AE9.E57C.0030.0@xxxxxxxxxx> <200610201012.k9KACIF29714@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45389CA5.E57C.0030.0@xxxxxxxxxx> <200610230145.k9N1jGF01307@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <453D8055.4030509@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1161703595.22514.59.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200610242354.k9ONsIF02543@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200610250311.k9P3BwF04686@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><1161774212.22514.86.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><200610260013.k9Q0DuF16474@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hi Ian,

I (Doi.Tsunehisa) said:
>> I not sure the typedef is needed at all -- nothing in unmodified_drivers
>> uses gpf_t as far as I can see. My current patchset doesn't define it at
>> all and builds ok on RHEL4.4. Perhaps it is an arch specific issue?
> 
>   Sorry, I might be confused. I'll check it.

  I've checked it. It's an ia64 arch specific issue indeed.

Thanks,
- Tsunehisa Doi

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

[Xen-ia64-devel] 14 vcpus VTI domain (Xen/IA64) pass 16 hours Crashme testing., You, Yongkang

Next by Date:

[Xen-devel] How to get the effective IP of domainU in domain 0?, Zhignag Wang

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel][PATCH][RESEND] PV drivers for HVM guests, Doi . Tsunehisa

Next by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel][PATCH][RESEND] PV drivers for HVM guests, Doi . Tsunehisa

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel][PATCH][RESEND] PV drivers for HVM guests