WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] reasons/requirements for some of patches/linux-2.6.16.29

To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] reasons/requirements for some of patches/linux-2.6.16.29/*
From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 13:09:48 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Andrew Warfield <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 05:10:24 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <45262720.76E4.0078.0@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <452620FF.76E4.0078.0@xxxxxxxxxx> <C14BC37A.2252%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <45262720.76E4.0078.0@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 08:51:28AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 06.10.06 09:25 >>>
> >On 6/10/06 8:25 am, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Could anyone give a description (and reason it is needed for Xen, if that's
> >> not obvious from the description) for each of
> >> 
> >> blktap-aio-16_03_06.patch
> >
> >Not sure. Andrew Warfield or Julian Chesterfield probably will know. I would
> >guess it's probably a backport of AIO changes from a more recent kernel, but
> >I'm not certain about that.
> 
> It's certainly not a backport (i.e. still needed in almost unchanged form in 
> 2.6.18).
> 
> >> net-gso-*.patch
> >
> >Backport of GSO patches from 2.6.17,18,... Done by Herbert Xu as part of his
> >big netfront/back reworking and upgrade. This will mostly go away when we
> >upgrade to 2.6.18.
> 
> I understand that. But what I need is an understanding of why Xen needs this
> right away.

A significant performance increase. Without it, DomU -> Dom0 networking is far 
less than baremetal wirespeed; With it, DomU -> Dom0 networking has parity
with baremetal wirespeed. Herbert's preso at the summit had a few more details

  http://xensource.com/files/summit_3/rdd-tso-xen.pdf

Regards,
Dan
-- 
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston.  +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=-           Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/              -=|
|=-               Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/               -=|
|=-  GnuPG: 7D3B9505   F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505  -=| 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel