|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards
On 14 Mar 2006, at 15:13, Rik van Riel wrote:
Tick N:
delta = 2.2
stolen = 0.9
blocked = 0.7
stolen and blocked will not get incremented, while
the per-cpu processed_time gets 2 jiffies
But we decrement delta_cpu *before* rounding down. So, after handling
stolen and blocked, we'll end up with delta_cpu==0.6 which gets rounded
down to 0 and so per-cpu processed_time gets 0 jiffies?
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
- Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
- Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
- Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
- Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
- [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Keir Fraser
- Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards,
Keir Fraser <=
- Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Keir Fraser
- Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Keir Fraser
|
|
|
|
|