|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Keir Fraser wrote:
> Yeah, sorry, I was being sloppy in my terminology. I think comparing
> stolen/blocked delta values with cpu_delta would be useful -- see if
> those are bigger than we'd expect and pushing per-cpu processed time too
> far forward.
stolen + blocked is larger than delta_cpu all the time:
Timer ISR/0: stolen 1636284 + blocked 109702879 > delta_cpu 108006671
printk: 33 messages suppressed.
Timer ISR/0: stolen 3664960 + blocked 25758521 > delta_cpu 24005880
printk: 32 messages suppressed.
Timer ISR/0: stolen 904813 + blocked 118716967 > delta_cpu 116009003
printk: 41 messages suppressed.
Timer ISR/0: stolen 2512450 + blocked 48318256 > delta_cpu 48005732
printk: 34 messages suppressed.
Digging into the hypervisor code now...
--
All Rights Reversed
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
- Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
- Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
- Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards,
Rik van Riel <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
- Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
- Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
- [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Keir Fraser
- Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Keir Fraser
- Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
|
|
|
|
|