|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards
On 10 Mar 2006, at 17:33, Rik van Riel wrote:
To that end, it would be interesting to see if after the first
do-while
loop in timer_interrupt(), you can end up with sched_time >
(processed_system_time + delta).
If so, we could end up running per-cpu processed_system_time ahead of
current system time and so get -ve delta the *next* time we run
timer_interrupt().
In my observations, delta is always positive. It is cpu_delta
which goes negative. I'll go count the cpu specific deltas and
will check to see if they are larger than the system wide delta.
Yeah, sorry, I was being sloppy in my terminology. I think comparing
stolen/blocked delta values with cpu_delta would be useful -- see if
those are bigger than we'd expect and pushing per-cpu processed time
too far forward.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
- Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
- Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
- Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards,
Keir Fraser <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
- Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
- Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
- Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
- [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Keir Fraser
- Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Keir Fraser
- Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
|
|
|
|
|