xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/24] VMI i386 Linux virtualization interfac
To: |
Zachary Amsden <zach@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/24] VMI i386 Linux virtualization interface proposal |
From: |
Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Mar 2006 11:02:34 -0800 |
Cc: |
Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, Joshua LeVasseur <jtl@xxxxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Pratap Subrahmanyam <pratap@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wim Coekaerts <wim.coekaerts@xxxxxxxxxx>, Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxx>, Jack Lo <jlo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dan Hecht <dhecht@xxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, Christopher Li <chrisl@xxxxxxxxxx>, Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx>, Leendert van Doorn <leendert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Anne Holler <anne@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jyothy Reddy <jreddy@xxxxxxxxxx>, Kip Macy <kmacy@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Ky Srinivasan <ksrinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dan Arai <arai@xxxxxxxxxx>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Tue, 14 Mar 2006 10:03:58 +0000 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<4415BE8F.1080609@xxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: |
<200603131758.k2DHwQM7005618@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1142273346.3023.38.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4415B857.9010902@xxxxxxxxxx> <1142274398.3023.40.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4415BA4F.3040307@xxxxxxxxxx> <1142275365.3023.44.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4415BE8F.1080609@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
* Zachary Amsden (zach@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> This we find to be quite true. Now, you can use a VMI kernel, make
> changes to it, run it on native hardware, and be confident that it will
> run properly in a VM as well. And you can develop in a VM, with
> confidence that you can run on native hardware. You can even replace
> the entire "ROM" image with your own custom debugging image to add any
> type of debugging or performance monitoring facility you want - and you
> have some very, very interesting hook points into the kernel that make
> that task much more achievable.
Replacing a ROM image is easier in terms package management, but still
requires full validation and certification process. Swapping out the
underlying core is a major change and needs to be re-validated.
thanks,
-chris
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] [RFC, PATCH 0/24] VMI i386 Linux virtualization interface proposal, Zachary Amsden
- [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/24] VMI i386 Linux virtualization interface proposal, Christoph Hellwig
- [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/24] VMI i386 Linux virtualization interface proposal, Zachary Amsden
- [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/24] VMI i386 Linux virtualization interface proposal, Joshua LeVasseur
- [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/24] VMI i386 Linux virtualization interface proposal, Andrew Morton
- [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/24] VMI i386 Linux virtualization interface proposal, Joshua LeVasseur
[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/24] VMI i386 Linux virtualization interface proposal, Sam Vilain
[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/24] VMI i386 Linux virtualization interface proposal, Anthony Liguori
|
|
|