WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/24] VMI i386 Linux virtualization interfac

To: virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/24] VMI i386 Linux virtualization interface proposal
From: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 12:56:49 -0600
Cc: Zachary Amsden <zach@xxxxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christopher Li <chrisl@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wim Coekaerts <wim.coekaerts@xxxxxxxxxx>, Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxx>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx>, Anne Holler <anne@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jyothy Reddy <jreddy@xxxxxxxxxx>, Kip Macy <kmacy@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Ky Srinivasan <ksrinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx>, Leendert van Doorn <leendert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 18:58:10 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4415BA4F.3040307@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: IBM Linux Technology Center
References: <200603131758.k2DHwQM7005618@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1142274398.3023.40.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4415BA4F.3040307@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.8.3
On Monday 13 March 2006 12:30, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> It is an advantage for everyone.  It cuts support and certification 
> costs for Linux distributors, software vendors, makes debugging and 
> development easier, and gives hypervisors room to grow while maintaining 
> binary compatibility with already released kernels.

It certainly is good for kernel developers and end-users.

However, it would be a foolish distributor or ISV who tests with one 
hypervisor and decides that covers all hypervisors which implement the same 
interface. So I'm not sure there's any advantage w.r.t. support and 
certification costs.

-- 
Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>