|  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
 
  |   |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |   xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Pin vcpu for VMX domain 
| Keir Fraser wrote:
> You don't need to __vmpclear at the time the affinity is changed. You
> can still do it from within arch_vmx_do_resume() -- it is valid to
> call smp_call_function() there. That avoids having yet another HVM
> function, and avoids calling yet another arch_* function from common
> code. 
> 
Keir:
        The latest patch is doing smp_call_function() at time of
arch_vmx_do_resume :-)
        But I get another issue recently that need it to be done
earlier. In VMX domain save/restore case, it pauses the VMX domain and
then do states save (and destroy). In this case the arch_vmx_do_resume
is not invoked, so it looks like doing smp_call_function earlier has
other benefits, any suggestion?
thx,eddie
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 | 
 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |  | 
[Xen-devel] [PATCH] Pin vcpu for VMX domain, Jiang, Yunhong
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Pin vcpu for VMX domain, Dong, Eddie
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Pin vcpu for VMX domain, Jiang, Yunhong
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Pin vcpu for VMX domain, Jiang, Yunhong
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Pin vcpu for VMX domain,
Dong, Eddie <=
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Pin vcpu for VMX domain, Dong, Eddie
 |  |  | 
  
    |  |  |