|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Pin vcpu for VMX domain
Keir Fraser wrote:
> You don't need to __vmpclear at the time the affinity is changed. You
> can still do it from within arch_vmx_do_resume() -- it is valid to
> call smp_call_function() there. That avoids having yet another HVM
> function, and avoids calling yet another arch_* function from common
> code.
>
Keir:
The latest patch is doing smp_call_function() at time of
arch_vmx_do_resume :-)
But I get another issue recently that need it to be done
earlier. In VMX domain save/restore case, it pauses the VMX domain and
then do states save (and destroy). In this case the arch_vmx_do_resume
is not invoked, so it looks like doing smp_call_function earlier has
other benefits, any suggestion?
thx,eddie
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Pin vcpu for VMX domain, Jiang, Yunhong
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Pin vcpu for VMX domain, Dong, Eddie
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Pin vcpu for VMX domain, Jiang, Yunhong
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Pin vcpu for VMX domain, Jiang, Yunhong
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Pin vcpu for VMX domain,
Dong, Eddie <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Pin vcpu for VMX domain, Dong, Eddie
|
|
|
|
|