|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Pin vcpu for VMX domain
On 8 Feb 2006, at 09:28, Jiang, Yunhong wrote:
The patch fixed pin-vcpu issue for VMX domain.
The __vmpclear should be done on the last_launch LP. It also migrate
the timers for vmx domain.
Signed-off-by: Yunhong Jiang yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Eddie Dong eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx
You don't need to __vmpclear at the time the affinity is changed. You
can still do it from within arch_vmx_do_resume() -- it is valid to call
smp_call_function() there. That avoids having yet another HVM function,
and avoids calling yet another arch_* function from common code.
Rather than calling vmx_remove_timers() from your SMP call function,
can you not just call it from vmx_reinstall_timers()? You explain why
the pit and hlt timers do not need to be re-activated in
vmx_reinstall_timer() -- what about the APIC timer?
There's no need to check active_timer() before calling stop_timer() --
stop_timer does the check for you.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Pin vcpu for VMX domain, Jiang, Yunhong
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Pin vcpu for VMX domain,
Keir Fraser <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Pin vcpu for VMX domain, Dong, Eddie
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Pin vcpu for VMX domain, Jiang, Yunhong
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Pin vcpu for VMX domain, Jiang, Yunhong
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Pin vcpu for VMX domain, Dong, Eddie
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Pin vcpu for VMX domain, Dong, Eddie
|
|
|
|
|