xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Pin vcpu for VMX domain
On 8 Feb 2006, at 12:58, Jiang, Yunhong wrote:
I'm not sure if it will has some corner case, and hope your
clarification for it.
considering following situation, assume the VMX switch from cpu 0->cpu1
1) on cpu0, the timer interrupt happened, so timer_softirq_action is
called, the pit_timer_fn is called, and in pit_timer_fn, it will try to
set the pit timer again.
2) before pit_timer_fn set the pit timer on cpu0, the stop_timer is
called on cpu1 on vmx_reinstall_timers.
3) after stop_timer finished, the pit_timer_fn on cpu0 set the ac_timer
on cpu0.
on this situation, the stop_timer on cpu1 will has no effect. And then
the init_timer may cause error situation.
In fact, I think the old patch itself is not safe on this situation,
since the stop_timer is called on IPI interrupt , which may run when
the
pit_timer_fn is running.
Good point. I'll have to add a migrate_timer() function I think, that
does the migration atomically.
That'll save you the hassle of stop/init/reactivate as well.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Pin vcpu for VMX domain, Jiang, Yunhong
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Pin vcpu for VMX domain, Dong, Eddie
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Pin vcpu for VMX domain, Jiang, Yunhong
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Pin vcpu for VMX domain,
Keir Fraser <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Pin vcpu for VMX domain, Jiang, Yunhong
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Pin vcpu for VMX domain, Dong, Eddie
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Pin vcpu for VMX domain, Dong, Eddie
|
|
|