|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] X86_64 "assert" when booting 64-bit image.
I can boot a 64-bit HVM image on my SVM-system, and it goes quite a long
way before it crashes (due to not finding the hard-disk image and thus
no root FS - which I think may well be the configuration file).
But if I set debug=y in the Rules.mk, I don't get very far at all - it
crashes well before it gets to any user-mode (Ring3) - in fact, I think
it's crashing pretty much as soon as it's beginning to set up
page-tables on the guest. See dump below. Also copy of source code
enclosed.
The same binary works just fine when running 32-bit HVM guest.
My real question is, is the "assert" stuff in shadow.h:1222 valid? If it
is valid, what is actually being checked?
[yes, I have read the code, but I confess I don't understand enough
about the internal workings of the shadow page-table to know what's
going on in this bit of code].
The code is based on XenSource changeset 8677:b721455c5e44.
--
Mats
(XEN) d->id=1 gpfn=0 gmfn=567a7 stype=a0000000 c=80000004
t=00000000f0000002 mfn_out_of_sync(gmfn)=0
mfn_is_page_table(gmfn)=0
(XEN) BUG at /root/xen-unstable-x64.hg/xen/include/asm/shadow.h:1222
(XEN) CPU: 0
(XEN) RIP: e010:[<ffff830000185ab8>]
(XEN) RFLAGS: 0000000000010286 CONTEXT: hypervisor
(XEN) rax: ffff8300001c7984 rbx: 0000000000000000 rcx:
00000000000017d7
(XEN) rdx: 0000000000000000 rsi: 0000000000000001 rdi:
ffff8300001c7984
(XEN) rbp: ffff8300001e3b38 rsp: ffff8300001e3ac0 r8:
00000000ffffffff
(XEN) r9: 00000000ffffffff r10: ffff8300001eeb3f r11:
ffff8300001ee77a
(XEN) r12: 0000000000000001 r13: 0000010100000000 r14:
0000010000000000
(XEN) r15: ffffffff80395fe0 cr0: 000000008005003b cr3:
000000000fe5c000
(XEN) Xen stack trace from rsp=ffff8300001e3ad8:
(XEN) 00000000f0000002 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
00000000000567a7
(XEN) 00000000000567a7 000000080018f51e 00000000000567a7
00000000a0000000
(XEN) 0000000000000000 ffff830000fd0080 0000000000000000
ffffffff8035521f
(XEN) ffff8300001e3b88 ffff83000019000f ffff83000026c0e0
0000000000000000
(XEN) 00000000000000e3 0000000040000000 0000000200000104
ffff8300001e3ba8
(XEN) ffff8300001e3b98 ffff830000fd0080 ffff8300001e3be8
ffff83000018bea1
(XEN) 00000000000000e3 0000000000057b6f 0000000000057b6f
000000000000fa54
(XEN) 0000000000000000 0000000040000000 0000000200000104
ffff83000fa540a0
(XEN) ffff830057b6f0a0 ffff830000fd0080 ffff8300001e3cc8
ffff830000187d43
(XEN) 0000000400db49e8 0000000040000000 00000000e0000008
00000004f0000002
(XEN) ffff83000fa4d000 00000000e0000008 ffff830057b6f000
ffff83000fa54000
(XEN) e0000007e0000008 ffffffff00db49d0 ffff8300001e3c68
00000000000001ff
(XEN) 00000000000001ff 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
0000000000000020
(XEN) ffff83000fa4d000 ffff83000fa54000 ffff830057b6f000
000000000000fa54
(XEN) 00000014001e3cc8 ffff830000264128 40000000001e3cc8
ffff830000fd0080
(XEN) ffffffffffffffff 0000000000000000 ffff8300001e3d38
ffff8300001881ef
(XEN) ffff800000001d10 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
ffff800000000810
(XEN) 0000000057b72101 00000008001e3df8 0000000057b72103
ffff8300001e3d58
(XEN) ffff83000fa56808 00000001001811d2 0000000000000000
ffff830000fd0080
(XEN) ffff8300001e3d58 ffff830000190aec ffff800000000808
ffff830000fd0080
(XEN) Xen call trace:
(XEN) [<ffff830000185ab8>] __shadow_status+0x2f0/0x31e
(XEN) [<ffff83000019000f>] entry_propagate_from_guest+0x97/0xe6
(XEN) [<ffff83000018bea1>] validate_entry_change+0x41/0x125
(XEN) [<ffff830000187d43>] resync_all+0x5e3/0x86c
(XEN) [<ffff8300001881ef>] sync_all+0x223/0x29d
(XEN) [<ffff830000190aec>] __shadow_sync_all+0x21/0x23
(XEN) [<ffff830000181395>] shadow_sync_all+0x86/0x176
(XEN) [<ffff83000017ebe1>] mov_to_cr+0x217/0x4d6
(XEN) [<ffff83000017f122>] svm_cr_access+0x282/0x4d7
(XEN) [<ffff8300001809b6>] svm_vmexit_handler+0x75f/0x9ff
(XEN)
(XEN)
(XEN) ****************************************
(XEN) Panic on CPU 0:
(XEN) CPU0 FATAL TRAP: vector = 6 (invalid operand)
(XEN) [error_code=0000]
(XEN) ****************************************
Selected section from
"hg annotate xen/include/asm-x86/shadow.h |grep -n $ | grep
12[0-9][0-9]"
1213:4239: #ifndef NDEBUG
1214:4799: if ( ___shadow_status(d, gpfn, stype) != 0 )
1215:4799: {
1216:6039: printk("d->id=%d gpfn=%lx gmfn=%lx stype=%lx c=%x
t=%" P\
Rtype_info " "
1217:4799: "mfn_out_of_sync(gmfn)=%d
mfn_is_page_table(gmfn)\
=%d\n",
1218:4877: d->domain_id, gpfn, gmfn, stype,
1219:8400: pfn_to_page(gmfn)->count_info,
1220:8400: pfn_to_page(gmfn)->u.inuse.type_info,
1221:4799: mfn_out_of_sync(gmfn),
mfn_is_page_table(gmfn));
1222:4799: BUG();
1223:4799: }
1224:4799:
1225:4799: // Undo the affects of the above call to
___shadow_status()'\
s perf
1226:4799: // counters, since that call is really just part of
an asser\
tion.
1227:4239: //
1228:4239: perfc_decrc(shadow_status_calls);
1229:4239: perfc_decrc(shadow_status_miss);
1230:4239: #endif
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] X86_64 "assert" when booting 64-bit image.,
Petersson, Mats <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] X86_64 "assert" when booting 64-bit image., Petersson, Mats
- RE: [Xen-devel] X86_64 "assert" when booting 64-bit image., Petersson, Mats
- RE: [Xen-devel] X86_64 "assert" when booting 64-bit image., Petersson, Mats
- RE: [Xen-devel] X86_64 "assert" when booting 64-bit image., Nakajima, Jun
- RE: [Xen-devel] X86_64 "assert" when booting 64-bit image., Nakajima, Jun
|
|
|
|
|