Re: [Xen-devel] linux/arch/xen/i386 or linux/arch/i386/xen

[Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxx>]

* Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) (dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx) wrote:
> > Will include/xen/ work for you?
> 
> OK with me, but will that be as hard to get by the Linux community
> as linux/xen for the generic C code?  If so, maybe
> include/asm-generic/xen/file.h?

Shouldn't be an issue.

> > That's part of sub-arch (this just needs to get include order right).
> 
> So for example include/asm-ia64/xen/file.h?

Yup, basically (s/xen/mach-xen/).

> Also, what about arch-specific C code?  Hopefully this
> will be minimized in drivers (by handling arch-specific
> features with macros) but for most of the other xen-specific
> files (e.g. setup.c) there will almost certainly need to
> be arch-specific subdirectories...
> 
> So drivers/xen/arch/ia64/file.c or
> drivers/xen/ia64/file.c or ??

Arch specific code should be in sub-arch.

thanks,
-chris

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel