|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] fooey. no interrupts.
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 02:35:08PM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Keir Fraser wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > > > 4. The original value of vcpu_data[0].evtchn_upcall_pending must be
> > > > > zero.
> > > > > 5. The value of vcpu_data[0].evtchn_upcall_mask must be zero.
> > > >
> > > > OK, this I don't totally see. From the code I posted before, it seems
> > > > to
> > > > me only the first three conditions matter.
> > >
> > > The first three conditions cause us to decide whether or not to
> > > schedule the target domain, sending a cross-cpu interrupt if
> > > necessary. The final two are checks just before calling back to the
> > > guest OS, just to check whether it is in a position to receive async
> > > callbacks.
> >
> > Keir, I don't see that in the code and Christian sent a note that left me
> > thinking it does not work that way.
> >
> > as Christian said, (4) doesn't do anything conditional, it does this:
> > /* The VCPU pending flag must be set /after/ update to
> > evtchn-pend. */
> > s->vcpu_data[0].evtchn_upcall_pending = 1;
> > guest_async_callback(d);
> >
> > which looks pretty unconditional to me. Is there something else I'm
> > missing?
>
> No, I'd forgotten how the code worked -- Christian is correct.
> evtchn_upcall_pending is set unconditionally on the CPU that is
> transmitting the event. evtchn_upcall_mask is only checked immediately
> before return to your guest OS to determine whether or not to create
> an async callback frame.
For completeness sake: evtchn_upcall_pending is also checked
immediately before return to your guest OS to determine whether
or not to create an async callback frame. Unlike evtchn_upcall_mask
evtchn_upcall_pending needs to be set while evtchn_upcall_mask needs
to be clear.
See /*test_guest_events:*/ in xen/arch/x86/x86_32/entry.S
christian
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] fooey. no interrupts., (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] fooey. no interrupts., ron minnich
- Re: [Xen-devel] fooey. no interrupts., Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] fooey. no interrupts., ron minnich
- Re: [Xen-devel] fooey. no interrupts., ron minnich
- Re: [Xen-devel] fooey. no interrupts., Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] fooey. no interrupts., ron minnich
- Re: [Xen-devel] fooey. no interrupts., Christian Limpach
- Re: [Xen-devel] fooey. no interrupts., Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] fooey. no interrupts., ron minnich
- Re: [Xen-devel] fooey. no interrupts., Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] fooey. no interrupts.,
Christian Limpach <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] fooey. no interrupts., ron minnich
- Re: [Xen-devel] fooey. no interrupts., Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] fooey. no interrupts., ron minnich
- Re: [Xen-devel] fooey. no interrupts., ron minnich
- Re: [Xen-devel] fooey. no interrupts., Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] fooey. no interrupts., ron minnich
|
|
|
|
|