|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v8] xen: Strip xen.efi by default
On Sat, 15 Nov 2025 at 06:23, Frediano Ziglio <freddy77@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Nov 2025 at 19:18, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 14/11/2025 3:40 pm, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 11/13/25 4:43 PM, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > > >> From: Frediano Ziglio <frediano.ziglio@xxxxxxxxx> > > >> > > >> For xen.gz file we strip all symbols and have an additional > > >> xen-syms.efi file version with all symbols. > > >> Make xen.efi more coherent stripping all symbols too. > > >> xen-syms.efi can be used for debugging. > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio <frediano.ziglio@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Release-Acked-By: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > Thanks. Unfortunately CI says no. > > > > Ubuntu's 20.04, 18.04 and 16.04 all fail: > > https://gitlab.com/xen-project/hardware/xen-staging/-/pipelines/2159622869 > > > > From 16.04: > > > > 2025-11-14T18:01:51.192964Z 01O strip xen-syms.efi -o xen.efi > > 2025-11-14T18:01:51.198151Z 01O strip:xen-syms.efi[.init]: relocation count > > is negative: File truncated > > 2025-11-14T18:01:51.198166Z 01O strip: xen.efi: Failed to read debug data > > section > > 2025-11-14T18:01:51.198169Z 01O strip:xen.efi: error copying private BFD > > data: File truncated > > 2025-11-14T18:01:51.198932Z 01O arch/x86/Makefile:207: recipe for target > > 'xen.efi' failed > > 2025-11-14T18:01:51.198937Z 01O make[3]: *** [xen.efi] Error 1 > > 2025-11-14T18:01:51.199616Z 01O build.mk:90: recipe for target 'xen' failed > > 2025-11-14T18:01:51.199619Z 01O make[2]: *** [xen] Error 2 > > 2025-11-14T18:01:51.200402Z 01O Makefile:600: recipe for target 'xen' failed > > 2025-11-14T18:01:51.200409Z 01O make[1]: *** [xen] Error 2 > > > > > > I find it hard to believe that the relocation count is really negative, > > and given that newer binuitls works, I expect this is a binutils bug. > > > > Unless the message is just misleading I find it hard to have a > negative number of items in a container. > > > Nevertheless, we need some workaround. Given that the previous > > behaviour was not to strip, I think we can reuse that for broken toolchains? > > > > Something like that ? > > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/Makefile b/xen/arch/x86/Makefile > index a154ffe6b2..c465eb12e2 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/x86/Makefile > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/Makefile > @@ -236,7 +236,9 @@ ifeq ($(CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO),y) > $(if $(filter --strip-debug,$(EFI_LDFLAGS)),:$(space))$(OBJCOPY) \ > -O elf64-x86-64 $(TARGET)-syms.efi $@.elf > endif > - $(STRIP) $(TARGET)-syms.efi -o $@ > + $(STRIP) $(TARGET)-syms.efi -o $@ || { \ > + LANG=C strip $(TARGET)-syms.efi -o $@ 2>&1 | grep -q \ > + "relocation count is negative" && mv -f $(TARGET)-syms.efi > $@; } > ifneq ($(CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO),y) > rm -f $(TARGET)-syms.efi > endif > > It will fall back to not stripping in case that bug is detected. I > don't know how to test it. > (the LANG=C is to always force the English message). > It looks like this change works better and CI is happy. It duplicates the linking with -s option if the strip fails. Yes, it's a hack and almost duplicates the one command above. What about it? diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/Makefile b/xen/arch/x86/Makefile index a154ffe6b2..5f5162841e 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/Makefile +++ b/xen/arch/x86/Makefile @@ -236,7 +236,10 @@ ifeq ($(CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO),y) $(if $(filter --strip-debug,$(EFI_LDFLAGS)),:$(space))$(OBJCOPY) \ -O elf64-x86-64 $(TARGET)-syms.efi $@.elf endif - $(STRIP) $(TARGET)-syms.efi -o $@ + $(STRIP) $(TARGET)-syms.efi -o $@ || \ + $(LD) $(call EFI_LDFLAGS,$(VIRT_BASE)) -T $(obj)/efi.lds $< \ + $(dot-target).1r.o $(dot-target).1s.o $(orphan-handling-y) \ + $(note_file_option) -s -o $@ ifneq ($(CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO),y) rm -f $(TARGET)-syms.efi endif Frediano
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |