[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] an obvious fix to PIC IO intercept

  • To: "Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx>, "Xen Devel" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 04:43:26 +0800
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 13:44:09 -0700
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcbuMfZd+m00pUnBSgOFo1LNeBzEQQA1Z+fQ
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] an obvious fix to PIC IO intercept

Hi Keir, this fix is critical to stability of HVM.
BTW, we are fixing MOVS and INS/OUTS for HVM, hopefully sending the patch 
tomorrow, acturally the code is totally messed up, althought they are nearly 
never used, but we believe they do introduce stability issue.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>[mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Li, Xin B
>Sent: 2006年10月13日 3:10
>To: Xen Devel
>Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] an obvious fix to PIC IO intercept
>an obvious fix to PIC IO intercept.
>In PIC IO, address from send_pio_req is physical address already.
>Signed-off-by: Xiaohui Xin <xiaohui.xin@xxxxxxxxx>
>Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Yang <xiaowei.yang@xxxxxxxxx>
>Signed-off-by: Xin Li <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx>

Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.