WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Re: preferred XEN dom0 OS

To: Simon Hobson <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Re: preferred XEN dom0 OS
From: Rudi Ahlers <Rudi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 09:35:28 +0200
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 00:37:22 -0700
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=softdux.com; h=MIME-Version:Reply-To:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To:Cc:Content-Type:X-Assp-ID:X-Assp-Version:X-Source:X-Source-Args:X-Source-Dir; b=ajGtcFQTgxA8L86T7KzR04BS9z9yb+IH+ggbsDn3MFGSO25QJn1WFq4crGUJDvdgdtg8A+mCTEkYtX89d1d85/NmDsAfCuDB9mbWDsy7HYjhqgBM61et1KBckvDdXhwB;
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <p06240831ca7a50f669b7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1314134830921-4728337.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <p06240831ca7a50f669b7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: rudi@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Simon Hobson <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Fantu wrote:
>>
>> We use only debian, new systems with Squeeze, other with Lenny that will
>> update soon
>
> +1 for Debian - both at work and home.
> OK, it's sometimes not the most up to date (if you stick with stable), but
> my experience is "it just works".
>
> But these questions are largely moot - most people run what they are most
> "comfortable" with, which may or may not be the best option technically.
>
> --
> Simon Hobson

XEN on CentOS 5.6 also just works, which is why why use that combination.

But, Red Hat 6 has dropped native XEN support for KVM - which I don't
want to use.
And since CentOS 5.6 / RH 5.6 only supports XEN 3.0 natively, I'm
thinking of maybe switching to something else.

But I don't have much experience with Debian / OpenSuse / anything else?
-- 
Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers
SoftDux

Website: http://www.SoftDux.com
Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com
Office: 087 805 9573
Cell: 082 554 7532

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users