WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Bonded interfaces with trunk and iscsi SAN

On 2/16/2011 4:05 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:45 AM, Donny Brooks<dbrooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
On 2/16/2011 3:41 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:35 AM, Donny Brooks<dbrooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Ok, I added the IP information to the ifcfg-br20 file and ifdown/ifup
that
interface. I am able to ping the 192.168.130.X range but nothing in the
192.168.131.X, 192.168.132.X, or 192.168.133.X ranges. Here is the
contents
of that file:

DEVICE=br20
TYPE=Bridge
BOOTPROTO=static
IPADDR=192.168.130.51
NETMASK=255.255.0.0
NETWORK=192.168.0.0
ONBOOT=yes
Does all host in 192.168.X.X use the same /16 (255.255.0.0) netmask?
A common error is when some hosts use /16, while others use /24.

The only thing on that vlan is the SAN. Now that I think about it the
windows machine is set to a /24 on each interface. So it may be that the SAN
is set for /24 instead of /16. Now just to figure out how to have 4
"interfaces" each with a /24 subnet...... hmmmm. :)
That's easy. ifcfg-br20:1, ifcfg-br20:2, etc. :D


I think it is getting late in the day.... I added the ifcfg-br20:1/2/3/4 files with the contents as follows:

[root@xen-test network-scripts]# cat ifcfg-br20\:*
DEVICE=br20:1
TYPE=Bridge
BOOTPROTO=static
IPADDR=192.168.130.53
NETMASK=255.255.255.0
NETWORK=192.168.130.0
ONBOOT=yes

DEVICE=br20:2
TYPE=Bridge
BOOTPROTO=static
IPADDR=192.168.131.53
NETMASK=255.255.255.0
NETWORK=192.168.131.0
ONBOOT=yes

DEVICE=br20:3
TYPE=Bridge
BOOTPROTO=static
IPADDR=192.168.132.53
NETMASK=255.255.255.0
NETWORK=192.168.132.0
ONBOOT=yes

DEVICE=br20:4
TYPE=Bridge
BOOTPROTO=static
IPADDR=192.168.133.53
NETMASK=255.255.255.0
NETWORK=192.168.133.0
ONBOOT=yes

and when I try to ifup the first interface I get this......

[root@xen-test network-scripts]# ifup br20:1
Bridge support not available in this kernel


How is bridge support not available in the kernel when it is bridges I am working with already? I think I will take a step away from this for a bit and come back to it tomorrow.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users