|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
RE: [Xen-users] RAID10 Array
> Some people mention problems with bonding more than two NICs for iSCSI
as
> the reordering of the commands/packets adds tremendously to latency
and load.
> If you want high performance and avoid latency issues you might want
to
> choose ATA-over-Ethernet.
Interesting. I always imagined that iSCSI was going to be the clear
winner in the case of one NIC as the hardware offloading should more
than compensate for the overhead of TCP, but I guess you lose all of
that when you start bonding links together, especially on the receive
side of things.
Some adapters have iSCSI specific acceleration, but I don't know if that
works with bonding at any level.
James
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: [Xen-users] RAID10 Array, (continued)
- Message not available
- RE: [Xen-users] RAID10 Array, Jonathan Tripathy
- Message not available
- RE: [Xen-users] RAID10 Array, Jonathan Tripathy
- RE: [Xen-users] RAID10 Array, Jonathan Tripathy
- Re: [Xen-users] RAID10 Array, Adi Kriegisch
- Re: [Xen-users] RAID10 Array, Bart Coninckx
- Message not available
- RE: [Xen-users] RAID10 Array, Jonathan Tripathy
- Re: [Xen-users] RAID10 Array, Adi Kriegisch
- RE: [Xen-users] RAID10 Array,
James Harper <=
- Re: [Xen-users] RAID10 Array, Adi Kriegisch
Re: [Xen-users] RAID10 Array, Bart Coninckx
Re: [Xen-users] RAID10 Array, jpp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
|
|
|
|