|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance
 
 
> Fajar, 
>    Are you sure about your DomU to DomU speeds? What methodology did you use 
> to test this? 
> I've done extensive testing in this area and I've never seen any numbers 
> that can come near that with or without 
> a pv_ops kernel. 
 
 I remembered seeing that much throughput on one of my tests, but I 
forgot which one. I'll look into it later. 
 
# iperf -c domU1 -r 
------------------------------------------------------------ 
Server listening on TCP port 5001 
TCP window size: 85.3 KByte (default) 
------------------------------------------------------------ 
------------------------------------------------------------ 
Client connecting to domU1, TCP port 5001 
TCP window size: 85.3 KByte (default) 
------------------------------------------------------------ 
[  5] local domU2 port 14092 connected with domU1 port 5001 
[ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth 
[  5]  0.0-10.0 sec  2.00 GBytes  1.72 Gbits/sec 
[  4] local domU2 port 5001 connected with domU1 port 1753 
[ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth 
[  4]  0.0-10.0 sec  1.57 GBytes  1.35 Gbits/sec 
 
This is on a 2.4GHz Opteron 2378. Since domU <-> domU transfer are 
mostly CPU-bound, faster CPUs should yield higher performance. 
 
-- 
Fajar 
 
  Thanks for the numbers I reran iperf tests and this is what I got on xen 3.4.1. This is on an 8 core Intel system with 16GB ram.
  DomU to DomU - 2.0 Gbits/sec DomU to Dom0 - 3.46 Gbit/sec 
Dom0 to DomU - 346 Mbits/sec
  These are similar ratios that I got before but because this system is about 3x faster than the old system the numbers are bigger. Fajar, if you get time could you see if you see something similar on your system?  
 Grant McWilliams 
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- [Xen-users] Xen Performance, LoD MoD
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Igor S. Pelykh
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Fajar A. Nugraha
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Grant McWilliams
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Fajar A. Nugraha
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance,
Grant McWilliams <=
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Fajar A. Nugraha
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Grant McWilliams
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Brian Krusic
 
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Fajar A. Nugraha
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Grant McWilliams
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Fajar A. Nugraha
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Grant McWilliams
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Grant McWilliams
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Fajar A. Nugraha
 
  
  
  
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Fasiha Ashraf
 
 
 
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |