|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance
 
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Igor S. Pelykh <kesha@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello xen-users,
>
> How can I to increase performance of network layer?
> And what is better (easy) for topology of DomU network (bridge, route,
> NAT )?
IMHO for network setup it's easier to use bridge. That you manage your
dom0 (network-wise) the same way you manage your L2 or L3 switch. When
you need NAT, you can use bridge + NAT (which is what libvirt does
with virbr0).
Performance-wise, I didn't have to do any tweaking with RHEL5. domU
can easily saturate uplink, with domU <-> domU throughput in the range
of 2-3 Gbps. Some people have reported problems (search the list
archive) with recent pv_ops dom0 kernel.
-- 
Fajar
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- [Xen-users] Xen Performance, LoD MoD
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Igor S. Pelykh
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance,
Fajar A. Nugraha <=
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Grant McWilliams
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Fajar A. Nugraha
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Grant McWilliams
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Fajar A. Nugraha
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Grant McWilliams
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Brian Krusic
 
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Fajar A. Nugraha
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Grant McWilliams
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Fajar A. Nugraha
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Grant McWilliams
 
  
  
  
 
 
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |