WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] About profiling xen

To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] About profiling xen
From: Marco Tizzoni <marco.tizzoni@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 00:20:50 +0200
Cc: "Fajar A." <fajar@xxxxxxxxx>, Fasiha Ashraf <feehapk@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xen <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 15:21:32 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mJpnc8vz+cEmEL3CAgn9IzgsbR9FlrISQ6V4fyppYhg=; b=aGQdXDT+hM/dKDAzwSrrSTuGBJHIiAy4zu9NJXcSIQNqNzffZyHAz1ejvVJdsMy8q8 Ep8ajDoR187MTpW82jzaZg/qSpmAlLM6Dqw2H+pZ8Mu+x/Rwhww1dEf9bhc45kH6WWPk UZb/TQ8EosQ2cnsX6DnhWbhGVISJ2qbTol1xI=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=bvOuW8jz8XvbTRMXZR45BCJlqAlCnjJNyzzEq0iSAPnLbeCj8DjkKtdFsnTvLe7AyQ PmFFNeKH+R0LZN7MJSObxlshx79Oflaqtf4XRnmB606jAprIfM1X+Z72isSRJF8K1KwZ 1UayNnp7gDv2fJytAXWVsCbAc8s0aWvrgAnrc=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4AC526D7.3070405@xxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <196324.1267.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4AC3E889.6060407@xxxxxxxx> <f9611b0f0910010035m40949fb3o5efe60469b4466b7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4AC516EC.3050704@xxxxxxxx> <f9611b0f0910011405h416d2372i3a4c7587b84a3fac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4AC51C48.40203@xxxxxxxx> <f9611b0f0910011426w4af0b164re00104fb5a66ebd9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4AC521DC.2020106@xxxxxxxx> <f9611b0f0910011455q722f5755i5f319d3e6f27c14a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4AC526D7.3070405@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 10/01/09 14:55, Marco Tizzoni wrote:
>> Sorry, I was not clear. It works as I expect, i.e going not over 1000
>> hz (my dom0 kernel has been compiled with 1000hz).
>>
>
> OK, that's definitely *not* expected.  If you're running with
> CONFIG_NO_HZ and HIGH_RES_TIMERS then timer resolution should have
> nothing to do with your HZ configuration.

> 100kHz is also very demanding.
> How does it work with 2kHz? 10kHz?

hal9k-dom0 ~ # ./testtimer .0001 |head -n10
1000 iterations at  0.000100 sec
0.000051
0.000885
0.000890
0.000892
0.000891
0.000892
0.000893
0.000893
0.000879
0.000893
hal9k-dom0 ~ # ./testtimer .002 |head -n10
1000 iterations at  0.002000 sec
0.000744
0.000978
0.000990
0.000990
0.000990
0.000991
0.000992
0.000991
0.000992
0.000990


m-

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel