|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] About profiling xen
On 10/01/09 14:55, Marco Tizzoni wrote:
> Sorry, I was not clear. It works as I expect, i.e going not over 1000
> hz (my dom0 kernel has been compiled with 1000hz).
>
OK, that's definitely *not* expected. If you're running with
CONFIG_NO_HZ and HIGH_RES_TIMERS then timer resolution should have
nothing to do with your HZ configuration.
> Following a couple of run of your testtimer:
>
> hal9k-dom0 ~ # ./testtimer .000001 |head -n10
>
I think expecting a timer to work at 1MHz is unreasonable.
> 1000 iterations at 0.000001 sec
> 0.000662
> 0.000946
> 0.000956
> 0.000960
> 0.000962
> 0.000956
> 0.000964
> 0.000963
> 0.000964
> 0.000964
>
> hal9k-dom0 ~ # ./testtimer .00001 |head -n10
>
100kHz is also very demanding.
How does it work with 2kHz? 10kHz?
J
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] About profiling xen, Marco Tizzoni
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] About profiling xen, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] About profiling xen, Marco Tizzoni
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] About profiling xen, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] About profiling xen, Marco Tizzoni
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] About profiling xen, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] About profiling xen, Marco Tizzoni
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] About profiling xen,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] About profiling xen, Marco Tizzoni
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] About profiling xen, Fasiha Ashraf
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] About profiling xen, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] About profiling xen, Fasiha Ashraf
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] About profiling xen, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
|
|
|
|
|