WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Disk performance under Xen

On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 11:59:50AM +0100, Gavin Conway wrote:
> >  Why do you need HVM guest? HVM, aka fully virtualized guests use Qemu
> >  to _emulate_ IDE (or SCSI) adapters and disks, so that'll be slow.
> >
> >  If you can't switch to paravirtual (PV) guests, at least try to
> >  install
> >  PV-on-HVM drivers, which should help a lot. Other possibility is to
> >  use
> >  stubdoms with HVM, but that's not available in Xen shipped in CentOS
> >  5.3.
> >  Stubdoms can be found from Xen 3.4.x
> >
> >  PV guests will be a lot faster, since there's no need for emulation.
> >  I recommend you to run PV guests.
> 
> Hi Pasi,
> 
> We get the same performance under windows but comparing the difference 
> between 
> the two it's easier to demonstrate with 2 x Linux systems. With regards to 
> why we use HVM, 
> this is so we can do P2V migrations of various OS' into Xen.
> 

For windows you should use PV-on-HVM drivers aswell, check the GPLPV drivers.
That way you'll get a LOT better performance.

You can do Linux P2V to PV guest aswell, no need to run HVM.

> Could you link me to the PV-on-HVM drivers for Linux, these sound like a good 
> way forward. 
> Also Stubdoms are a new one on me, do you know of any recommended reading. 
> Googling draws up a blank apart from problems people have had.
> 

http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2008/08/28/xen-33-feature-hvm-device-model-domain/
http://www.xen.org/files/xensummitboston08/SamThibault_XenSummit.pdf

Check those out.

-- Pasi

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>