Re: [Xen-users] Is xen3.4.0 more stable than 3.3.1?

["Fajar A. Nugraha" <fajar@xxxxxxxxx>]

2009/5/28 이동규 <dongq.lee@xxxxxxx>:
> I am considering updating xen to 3.3.1 from 3.0.3 because recently dom0
> memory squeezing problem occurred.

If by "3.0.3" you mean RPM packages from RHEL/Centos, the real version
is actually 3.1.2 + lots of backports. Don't let the RPM number fool
you :)

>
> I know that the latest version of xen is 3.4.0 but I am wondering if xen
> 3.4.0 is more stable than 3.3.1.

I've been using both RH's Xen and 3.3.1, and they're both stable. Note
Luke's suggestion, and you might also want to look at this:
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/cgi-bin/mesg.cgi?a=xen-users&i=7207d96f0903250937m5567070bw759f3def3da04e89%40mail.gmail.com

I've also started using Xen 3.4 (same settings) on another server, no
problems so far. If you use RHEL/Centos it's easier to use packages
from http://www.gitco.de/repo/. For most purposes they would work fine
with RHEL's -xen kernel. The exception is if you use some new features
that needs dom0 kernel support (like scsi passthru), but (from your
usage description) you won't need it.

-- 
Fajar

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users