WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Anything come close to esx for xen?

Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Anything come close to esx for xen?
From: Thomas Goirand <thomas@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 06:41:43 +0800
Cc: xen-users <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:42:27 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=goirand.fr; h=message-id: date:from:mime-version:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to: content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns/txt; s=postfix; bh= 7vp5adS6zzvwSZTf8NODUBXGYYc=; b=Aq/y103lyoxHi2mJkn+M6J7B4ROFKNmT dGzsNqlZoA185SfwQE7OKVKKfFxo3EE9Rl1DWqGI4Ho5cJgPveKNXokkQQ7Xcab2 Ina3vVV0Qtm199W6n4zGoUmp7dIR2IaaYEnHQIBJ2jaCG5n0MVgvP46OagtTyhQC FqRZZsLh3FY=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=goirand.fr; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=postfix; b= k3DNc2x6qqDskCON/MgsIkbLb2JEqSBOi1B9uqLbx+udsM0aJstTome3sqZ0n3hR 7tuhuzPYPou2aFJsRVaSFJpwGH9Of1SZGSVliKnOKZK+Q10mxBBkXKfAEhPqYVCp VpDEVomEuHVfCEipgYzGsiKvyoKociw0SKoCv3dJTPo=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <2009223145857.937048@leena>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Openpgp: id=98EF9A49
Organization: GPLHost
References: <2009223145857.937048@leena>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090103)
lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Corrected, things DO change, just not that often :). 
> 
> Been using open source since the early 90's and most projects have remained 
> open while some have indeed gone commercial. No problem with commercial, 
> that's not my point. My point is, don't need the surprises. If I use an open 
> source project, I hope I can use it long term. If I use a commercial product, 
> same thing. 
> 
> Of course, either can change as well but again, my point is simply about 
> being surprised.
> 
> Mike

The licensing change is unclear to me. Is it free as free beer, or free
as freedom? Is XenServer now in open source? Where can I find such
information?

I have the feeling it's just free as free beer. In fact, I don't like AT
ALL the spirit of Citrix here. We can see in the press release:

“Free hypervisors with limited functionality have been around for a long
time."

Just as if the hypervisor of the OpenSource Xen was too limited. This is
trying to confuse people, so they think that only the non open source
version of the Xen hypervisor was good... The reality is in fact that
the paid version of Xen adds almost nothing, except maybe being stuck to
a silly RPM based distributions.

All this is definitively not for me, I'd rather continue working on our
own open source project (REALLY free: free as freedom to see my
code...), that clearly leads the way: we are the only company in the
world that has released an open source web control panel aimed at
commercial VPS hosting which is included/shipped in Debian Lenny. I have
just added an "appliance builder" tonight (point and click, and you have
a VPS with nx-server automatically setup using apt at the first boot...).

People working with open source will ALWAYS be better integrated, or
even shipped with the distributions. THAT changes everything.

Thomas Goirand


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>