|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] disk backend performance
 
Am Freitag, den 28.11.2008, 17:01 +0100 schrieb Stefan de Konink:
> On Fri, 28 Nov 2008, Thomas Halinka wrote:
> 
> > Am Freitag, den 28.11.2008, 16:22 +0100 schrieb Stefan de Konink:
> > > On Fri, 28 Nov 2008, Thomas Halinka wrote:
> > >
> > > > i do not need any benchmarks. i measured that iscsi could saturate a
> > > > GB-Link with about 55-60% - AoE was about 80-85% at less CPU-Usage!
> > >
> > > My benchmarks for iSCSI vs NFS performance tests both saturate the links
> > > 10GE ->  1GE, while the first has a bit better < 10% performance.
> >
> > A GBit-Link has a maximum throughput of 110 MB/s and you really got
> > about 100 MB/s? ;)
> 
> NetApp is fast...Solaris too if it has enough disk;)
Solaris NFS rocks ;)
but Linux-NFS sucks.
> 
> Stefan
> 
Thomas
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Guillaume
 
- RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Venefax
 - RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Thomas Halinka
 
- RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Venefax
 - RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Thomas Halinka
 - RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Venefax
 - RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Thomas Halinka
 - Re: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Javier Guerra
 
- Re: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Stefan Bauer
 
- RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Joseph L. Casale
 - RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Venefax
 
 
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |