 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] disk backend performance
| To: | "Stefan de Konink" <stefan@xxxxxxxxx>, "Xen Users" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-users] disk backend performance |
| From: | Guillaume <guillaume.chardin@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:13:43 +0100 |
| Cc: | |
| Delivery-date: | Fri, 28 Nov 2008 08:14:21 -0800 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=vQAxgDbxNh9B8HYXO7Ekvet+lQ4CrVssYqhywhzPNoc=; b=x0JVlklk/lCGcGdbv21nD+g47iuzOiFzJsM2HVGT/fVllZEnFoiDjEciLPu1khaZaN mMy9xsucaQWxFTKgYf0q7bdYH+NBF0ZSurW9nDm5bbxOam9KcHmqV+lIsg4WdoUzNtC3 lxshTAKkD5G6ZOQKi+vvl9xyLYk1IlZZj4SW0= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=o6I/FZ/RDM16oreTzuSi366uEgpdB1d7AGT4GehxWGOnRGdr/Q3F2vbDbGHk1iJavW 9ojKsRpu+kwbfnqlS6FFi2rMbGfAQl6dW/f3WaU4NosANJ3YLQfsJ9T9G/puzvQPFyXy JQ5DR5DCEOYrq5O2Y2TmcM5ZqPHufdUMb1INQ= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <aa184bd0811280811i7ac45db1sa17207fb35a5c941@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <1227886587.25974.47.camel@ubu32> <20081128170031.W30636-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <aa184bd0811280811i7ac45db1sa17207fb35a5c941@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
2008/11/28 Guillaume <guillaume.chardin@xxxxxxxxx> > > > 2008/11/28 Stefan de Konink <stefan@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> On Fri, 28 Nov 2008, Thomas Halinka wrote: >> >> > Am Freitag, den 28.11.2008, 16:22 +0100 schrieb Stefan de Konink: >> > > On Fri, 28 Nov 2008, Thomas Halinka wrote: >> > > >> > > > i do not need any benchmarks. i measured that iscsi could saturate a >> > > > GB-Link with about 55-60% - AoE was about 80-85% at less CPU-Usage! >> > > >> > > My benchmarks for iSCSI vs NFS performance tests both saturate the links >> > > 10GE -> 1GE, while the first has a bit better < 10% performance. >> > >> > A GBit-Link has a maximum throughput of 110 MB/s and you really got >> > about 100 MB/s? ;) >> >> NetApp is fast...Solaris too if it has enough disk;) >> >> >> Stefan Hey, i'd never thinking that my thread will bring so much ppl !! And about phy:// and disk:// :) which one is the best ? (was original question :] not SAN, FC and other ! but interresting) -- Guillaume _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Thomas Halinka |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Thomas Halinka |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Stefan de Konink |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Thomas Halinka |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
