WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] DomU ethernet speed?

To: "Javier Guerra" <javier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] DomU ethernet speed?
From: "Emre Erenoglu" <erenoglu@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:27:27 +0200
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Simon Gottschlag <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:28:04 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=uGaxTpOjL/3aMNuL9tGek2xo29930z6+/W0AE3dGkPs=; b=e6ouR3EAMduIWeCc4mNEg7Tp3TKvzXBpD5/5E9mpSGtZZNRjmBvS3pIaeKPVtCJQCL cCONWs2LGMfOFmDUu4hs9uOIcNJO4pIaFMEWT62OPZFHt/tCH8cfakzXpNGyWYN6hha5 PyL57/8Hp6HmHO2ruv5EM0kDMvhNA5J/wbkI4=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=Y+tWPe1zjzsr/2LA1hZqPFHSm97P0LY3SJhnlSYOwEjQEDFe4ZrSbQvE8rkX9ckSUx LEqcYi7Dzinv4GxeRSwAvcpW/yBCbl1icFMnQNAkMUIJolsMkuBAfF9B051G82aOZpa4 NJVyEaJi1ePkrwsW77zcbFlHNWrVpFSXzNRDI=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <90eb1dc70808201344he9a2557jf6e8b9232a877830@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <b57f28140808201245v10c75f8dxa993f6ce528441a9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <90eb1dc70808201249o65b87f1difea8ccce491fe852@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <b57f28140808201334r4b0a8d1fxe5b22055404b94f6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <90eb1dc70808201344he9a2557jf6e8b9232a877830@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
You can try to use unmodified_drivers (ie Paravirtual drivers) on your guest kernel. That will give much better performance compared to an emulated NIC.

Emre

On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 10:44 PM, Javier Guerra <javier@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Simon Gottschlag <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> So it just depends on the physical card?

no, it's totally detached from the card.

what the DomU sees and the hypervisor manages goes only to the Dom0.
there usually it's routed/NAT'ed/bridged to some physical card, but
that's not DomU's business.

> It's just that I've been experiencing that it takes longer time to load
> rar-archives etc via samba and transferring files from my server now when
> it's a virtual machine. It's still the same hardware, just that I've made it
> into a domU.
> Is this just something in my head or is it really going slower?

usually virtual machines are slower than bare metal.  how much slower
depends on lots of factors. (maybe 5% slower, maybe 400% or more)

--
Javier

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users



--
Emre
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>