WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] CentOS 5.1 & Xen 3.2

To: "Fajar A. Nugraha" <fajar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] CentOS 5.1 & Xen 3.2
From: Sadique Puthen <sputhenp@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 15:32:05 +0530
Cc: Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 02:02:45 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <47A90D46.5060608@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <10589007.2611202202731717.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47A82DAE.7060409@xxxxxxxxxx> <47A90D46.5060608@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070926)
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
Sadique Puthen wrote:
--[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
Purely from other forums where people were having issues with the X86_64 platform. Will give it a go then.
I say RHEL/Centos 5.1 works nice on x86_64. Actually, C5.0 works nice, but 5.1 is a big improvement, including support for 32-on-64. Don't be surprised if the xen rpm version still says 3.0 though.

Does anybody know when 3.2 will make it into CentOS ?

This wouldn't happen since rebasing to xen-3.2 in centos5 is going to break a lot of existing production server implementations. The biggest issue is that XenSource does not guarentee ABI compatability between the HV & userspace between major releases.


Isn't that also the case with RHEL5.0/Xen3.0 -> RHEL5.1/Xen3.1?

It was, but that was an exception.

--Sadique


Regards,

Fajar

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users



_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>