Re: [Xen-users] Bonding – dom0 or dom1 ? and why is vif1.1 missi

El sáb, 10-03-2007 a las 12:51 +0200, Ian Brown escribió:
> Thanks, Jerry.
> 
>   - I am looking at this 3 pages Dell pdf doc and will try something like it.
> 
>   - A question:
>   It is said there that :
> "The bridge and the bond should be configured to disable Address
> Resolution Protocol (ARP) and multicast. In the test environment,"
> and this should be done by:
> 
> # ip link set xenbr1 arp off
> # ip link set xenbr1 multicast off
> 
> Does anybody knows why this is so ?
> 
        I don' know. What I know is that if I configure this, I can't reach the
xen dom0 (but I can reach domU's).

        The problem I am having with this configuration is that it works while
I am pinging to domUs (I guess it still works with other kind of
traffic), but as soon as I stop pinging it, the bridge stop working.

        Any idea?

-- 
Angel L. Mateo Martínez
Sección de Telemática
Área de Tecnologías de la Información       _o)
y las Comunicaciones Aplicadas (ATICA)      / \\
http://www.um.es/atica                    _(___V
Tfo: 968367590
Fax: 968398337


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

RE: [Xen-users] booting an ISO inside Xen (full virt), Petersson, Mats

Next by Date:

Re: [Xen-users] Migration only works one way (seemingly depending on machine's boot time), Tim Post

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-users] Bonding – dom0 or dom1 ? and why is vif1.1 missing in DomU?, Ian Brown

Next by Thread:

Re: [Xen-users] Bonding – dom0 or dom1 ? and why is vif1.1 missing in DomU?, Mark Williamson

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Bonding – dom0 or dom1 ? and why is vif1.1 missing in Do