| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] xen on amd64 or intel
as i mentioned earlier (sorry i don't remember the source anymore), i
read a test which said as long as you have only as many vm's as actual
processor cores the opteron is better, otherwise intel was better due to
its hyperthreading. the performance loss is already low now for both
plattforms (we measured less than ca. 5%), i only experience signifcant
performance problems with the gbit network of the domUs.
I remember reading a mail here saying you're better off disabling HT on
Intel when running Xen, as it causes a major slowdown if the two threads
are assigned to different domUs.
There was no explanation given, so I'm not sure if thats true. (Maybe
problems with pagetable cache?)
Depends what you're doing with the hyperthreads...
HT is happiest when the activities of the two threads are using the same
working set in the cache, so they don't fight over cache space. If they're
actually two different virtual machines then they're definitely not using
the same working set (as things stand today, since there is no large scale
data sharing), so the cache behaviour cannot be expected to be helpful and
may be harmful to performance.
HOWEVER
Dedicating a hyperthread to dom0 may benefit performance. Particularly in
the case where it's impossible to dedicate an entire core to dom0 (e.g. you
only have a uniprocessor). Since IO has to happen through dom0, it's
beneficial for it to have a logical CPU to itself to run on all the time,
so that a context switch isn't necessary for IO to be performed. This
effect is most noticeable when running under heavy network loads and had a
fairly large benefit in our benchmarks vs the non-HT uniprocessor case.
Cheers,
Mark
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
| |
|
Home