WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] xen save error

To: "Cole, Ray" <Ray_Cole@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] xen save error
From: Steven Hand <Steven.Hand@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 17:05:12 +0100
Cc: Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Steven.Hand@xxxxxxxxxxxx, bryant.johan@xxxxxxxxx, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 16:08:16 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: Message from "Cole, Ray" <Ray_Cole@xxxxxxx> of "Thu, 15 Sep 2005 09:42:04 CDT." <4C38B972143E1A4BA2D5E1F12104ECA60AFDF949@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>There is a thread in here called "Live migration problem" that has a =
>bunch of information.  What I was able to narrow it down, via printk's =
>in the kernel, is the kernel receives a message indicating it needs to =
>suspend and adds to the work queue.  However the kernel never executes =
>the work to suspend and xen gives up waiting for it to happen.  The last =
>thing I see is the kernel calls scheduled_work=20
>
>The xfrd.log indicated it was unable to suspend.  There was nothing more =
>really in those logs.  I'll try to find some time today to re-run the =
>tests again.  I recently put my 3 machines back to the base 2.0.7 (no =
>'testing') so I'll need to put two of them back to 2.0.7 testing.  FWIW, =
>this was using the 2.6.11.12 kernel for the user domain with everything =
>else being 2.0.7 testing.
>
>http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2005-08/msg00626.html =
>will get you to the thread.

yes - though this doesn't seem to be the same error; in particular 
the "[ERR] XFRD> Error adding op field" is the bit I was referring to 
never having seen before...

cheers,

S.


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users