| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-merge
Re: [Xen-merge] Re: synch_bitops.h
>So AFAIK synch_bitops.h is equivilent to bitops.h with #defined
>CONFIG_SMP
>
>Can't we use this somehow to reduce the amount of repeated code?
Sure, this would be possible. But would anyone like the to be added
conditionals (bitops.h has many more operations defined than
synch_bitops.h, and these would need to be disabled)? And similarly for
the need to alter the function names? At least from my experience,
adding a new file will have less resistance than cluttering an existing
one...
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-merge mailing list
Xen-merge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-merge
|
|
|
| |
|
Home