| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-merge
Re: [Xen-merge] [PATCH] broken install
>This is not quite what I had in mind -- I was hoping we could move all
>of the install code into the script and have a xen one.
>
>So, with the patch below, won't we then be using the regular i386
>install.sh if we try installing to /boot (or /)? That seems rather
>optimistic...
Why? How is the xenolinux kernel different from a native one?
>> Again, while I agree that this seems more logical, there are two
>> arguments against it:
>> - it is inconsistent with how native i386/x86-64 work
>
>Neither of them build a vmlinuz target/file in the first place, how
>can it be inconsistent?
They build a bzImage instead, which is the exact equivalent of
vmlinuz.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-merge mailing list
Xen-merge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-merge
|
|
|
| |
|
Home