RE: [Xen-merge] CONFIG_XEN vs. CONFIG_X86{,_64}_XEN

["Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>]

Agree, but s/2/20/. :-(   Buy you a beer at the summit? :-}

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-merge-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:xen-merge-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> Jimi Xenidis
> Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 10:28 AM
> To: Chris Wright
> Cc: xen-merge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Jan Beulich
> Subject: Re: [Xen-merge] CONFIG_XEN vs. CONFIG_X86{,_64}_XEN
> 
> 
> On Dec 22, 2005, at 11:29 AM, Chris Wright wrote:
> 
> > * Jimi Xenidis (jimix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> >> Lets not forget CONFIG_PPC_XEN :)
> >
> > After upstream dir rename shouldn't that be 
> CONFIG_POWERPC_XEN? ;-)  
> > j/k
> Working that as we speak.
> 
> Feels like the last 2 months have just been a merge-a-thon for me :)
> 
> -JX
> --
> "I got an idea, an idea so smart my head would explode if I even
>    began to know what I was talking about." -- Peter Griffin (Family  
> Guy)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-merge mailing list
> Xen-merge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-merge
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-merge mailing list
Xen-merge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-merge