Re: [Xen-merge] xen-merge mailing list

[Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxx>]

* Rik van Riel (riel@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, Ian Pratt wrote:
> 
> > Is it worth us setting up one or more Linux 2.6 mercurial tress on 
> > xenbits that we can use to show each other what we're doing? Patches for 
> > this sort of thing aren't easy to read.
> 
> This worries me.  Patches that are not easy to read are
> going to be horribly hard to merge into xen-unstable...

The bits that are rough to read are largely renames.

> Now if we had an idea on what shape would be best for
> merging things into the xen-unstable tree, we could
> work backwards from there to come up with the kind of
> changes to generate.

I've got something that's mostly compiling, that maybe a useful halfway
step.  A good point towards splitting the work apart.  I'll clean up
what I've got and post it later today.

thanks,
-chris

_______________________________________________
Xen-merge mailing list
Xen-merge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-merge