RE: [Xen-merge] xen-merge mailing list

[Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, Ian Pratt wrote:

> Is it worth us setting up one or more Linux 2.6 mercurial tress on 
> xenbits that we can use to show each other what we're doing? Patches for 
> this sort of thing aren't easy to read.

This worries me.  Patches that are not easy to read are
going to be horribly hard to merge into xen-unstable...

Now if we had an idea on what shape would be best for
merging things into the xen-unstable tree, we could
work backwards from there to come up with the kind of
changes to generate.

Of course, we may still come up with the conclusion
that we want the mercurial trees, but at least we'll
know why ;)

-- 
The Theory of Escalating Commitment: "The cost of continuing mistakes is
borne by others, while the cost of admitting mistakes is borne by yourself."
  -- Joseph Stiglitz, Nobel Laureate in Economics

_______________________________________________
Xen-merge mailing list
Xen-merge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-merge