xen-ia64-devel
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d638
To: |
Tristan Gingold <tgingold@xxxxxxx>, Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue |
From: |
"Zhang, Jingke" <jingke.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Mon, 6 Oct 2008 17:24:37 +0800 |
Accept-language: |
en-US |
Acceptlanguage: |
en-US |
Cc: |
"xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Mon, 06 Oct 2008 02:24:45 -0700 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<20081006084012.GA6906@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: |
<BB1F052FCDB1EA468BD99786C8B1ED2C01B86F9A20@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081006024810.GC26581%yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <BB1F052FCDB1EA468BD99786C8B1ED2C01B86F9B57@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081006033557.GD26581%yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081006084012.GA6906@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Sender: |
xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Thread-index: |
Acknjzkr/w8UTCZQR+eI8SG8SuEiLgABbfzw |
Thread-topic: |
[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue |
Tristan Gingold wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 12:35:57PM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
>>> I used GFW#129, image type is QCOW. Since it works for you, what is
>>> the difference between us? Thanks. :)
>>
>> Ah, I'm using patched GFW. I sent out two patches as
>>
>> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-ia64-devel/2008-09/msg00067.html
>> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-ia64-devel/2008-09/msg00068.html
>>
>> But I guess Tristan is too busy to commit those.
>> The patch in msg00067.html would fix the issue. Could you try that
>> patch?
>
> Hi,
>
> sorry for being to slow! I have just committed the two patches.
Hi Tristan,
I can pull the 2 csets now. But I found the binary/xenia64-gfw.bin does not
change. As we know, it is hard to set up the building environment for GFW. So,
could you please help to update the binary file togather? Many thanks!
>
> Thanks,
> Tristan.
Thanks,
Zhang Jingke
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Zhang, Jingke
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Isaku Yamahata
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Zhang, Jingke
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Isaku Yamahata
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Zhang, Jingke
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Isaku Yamahata
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Zhang, Jingke
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Isaku Yamahata
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Tristan Gingold
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue,
Zhang, Jingke <=
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, KUWAMURA Shin'ya
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Isaku Yamahata
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, KUWAMURA Shin'ya
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, KUWAMURA Shin'ya
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Zhang, Jingke
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Zhang, Jingke
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, KUWAMURA Shin'ya
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Isaku Yamahata |
Next by Date: |
[Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: balloon: compilation fix., Isaku Yamahata |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Tristan Gingold |
Next by Thread: |
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, KUWAMURA Shin'ya |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|