xen-ia64-devel
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d638
Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 11:16:02AM +0800, Zhang, Jingke wrote:
>> Isaku Yamahata wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 09:54:13AM +0800, Zhang, Jingke wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> There is no new regression found in Cset#18580. Three old
>>>> issues still existed.
>>>>
>>>> Old issue (3):
>>>> 1. Qemu will disappear and VTI hangs when we do 'xm restore'
>>>> and 'xm migrate'
>>>
>>> Hi. Does this still exist?
>>> The change set 18578:ba543f51c6f1 should fix this.
>>> At least works for me with xm save/restore. I haven't tried xm
>>> migrate, though.
>>>
>>> Does qemu-dm exit with the following message?
>>> from xen_vga_vram_map() in hw/vga.c
>>> fprintf(stderr, "Failed to map vram nr_pfn=0x%lx
>>> vram_addr=%llx: %s\n", nr_pfn, (unsigned long
>>> long)vram_addr, strerror(errno)); exit(1);
>>>
>>
>> Yes, my qemu-dm log shows: Failed to map vram nr_pfn=0x200
>> vram_addr=c0000000: Invalid argument
>> I used GFW#129, image type is QCOW. Since it works for you, what is
>> the difference between us? Thanks. :)
>
> Ah, I'm using patched GFW. I sent out two patches as
>
> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-ia64-devel/2008-09/msg00067.html
> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-ia64-devel/2008-09/msg00068.html
>
> But I guess Tristan is too busy to commit those.
> The patch in msg00067.html would fix the issue. Could you try that
> patch?
Thanks, I see.
GFW building needs too much to set up the compile environment. So, I am afraid
it may need some time for me to check it.
Anyway, I will mark the old issue1 as a GFW issue first. Hope Tristan can check
it in soon. :)
>
> thanks,
>
>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>>> 2. With 4096M, VTI can not boot up emulated rtl8139
>>>> network-card
>>>> 3. With 4095M, qemu of VTI guest will disappear when booting
>>>>
Thanks,
Zhang Jingke
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Zhang, Jingke
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Isaku Yamahata
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Zhang, Jingke
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Isaku Yamahata
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue,
Zhang, Jingke <=
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Isaku Yamahata
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Zhang, Jingke
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Isaku Yamahata
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Tristan Gingold
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Zhang, Jingke
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, KUWAMURA Shin'ya
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Isaku Yamahata
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, KUWAMURA Shin'ya
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, KUWAMURA Shin'ya
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Zhang, Jingke
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Isaku Yamahata |
Next by Date: |
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Isaku Yamahata |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Isaku Yamahata |
Next by Thread: |
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Isaku Yamahata |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|