|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-ia64-devel
[Xen-ia64-devel] RE: [PATCH 09/27] ia64/xen: implement the arch specific
>> +#define is_kernel_addr(x) \
>> + ((PAGE_OFFSET <= (x) && \
>> + (x) < (PAGE_OFFSET + (1UL << IA64_MAX_PHYS_BITS))) || \
>> + (KERNEL_START <= (x) && \
>> + (x) < KERNEL_START + KERNEL_TR_PAGE_SIZE))
>>
>> Misleading name. What does it consider a "kernel_addr"? Just
>> region 7 (up to physical address limit) and the piece of region
>> 5 that is mapped by itr[0]/dtr[0]. Preferebly pick a better name
>> or add a comment here saying what this is testing for.
>
> How about xencomm_is_phys_contiguous()?
> Renaming it requires patches to drivers/xen/xencomm.c.
> If okay, I'll also send the patch to common files.
That sounds a bit more meaningful ... except that such a function
would also require a "size" (or "end") parameter. It makes
no sense to ask whether a solitary address is contiguous.
-Tony
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
|
|
|
|