|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-ia64-devel
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] paravirt_ops and its alternatives
 
Yang, Fred wrote:
> Dong, Eddie wrote:
>> Re-post it to warmup discussion in case people can't read PPT format,
> 
> IVT is very performance sensitive for the native Linux, how about
> dual IVT tables alternative for CPU virtualization?  It would need
> maintainance effort but it would be much cleaner forIA64 situation.
> -Fred  
Dual IVT table could be a night mare for Tony, I guess. But yes we
need to have more active discussion to kick it off.
Tony:
        I think this discussion shouldn't exclude IA64 Linux 
community (at least for those active members), will u like us to post 
this kind of discussion to IA64 community? Or do u have list of people 
who are most interested?
        I want to kick off some high level discussion.
thx, eddie
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] paravirt_ops and its alternatives, Dong, Eddie
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] paravirt_ops and its alternatives, Yang, Fred
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] paravirt_ops and its alternatives,
Dong, Eddie <=
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] paravirt_ops and its alternatives, Alex Williamson
 - RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] paravirt_ops and its alternatives, Yang, Fred
 - RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] paravirt_ops and its alternatives, Dong, Eddie
 - Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] paravirt_ops and its alternatives, Isaku Yamahata
 - RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] paravirt_ops and its alternatives, Dong, Eddie
 - Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] paravirt_ops and its alternatives, Isaku Yamahata
 - RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] paravirt_ops and its alternatives, Dong, Eddie
 
  
  
  
 
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |